Tucking a defender into midfield answers a specific question about build-up that most sides never actually face.
Inverted full backs solved a problem most teams lack
The idea spread faster than the reasoning behind it. A full back steps inside during build-up, forms a temporary double pivot, and suddenly every academy in the country is teaching it to seventeen-year-olds who will never play in a team that dominates the ball for eighty minutes.
Understand what the move is for. It exists because a side that keeps possession deep in the opponent's half has too many bodies wide and not enough centrally, which leaves it exposed to a counter through the middle and short of passing angles when the opponent blocks the flanks. Moving a full back inside fixes both at once. It adds a central passer and it puts a body in the corridor a counterattack would use.
Now consider a team that does not dominate possession. It has neither problem. It has the opposite problem, which is getting the ball forward at all and defending crosses when it loses it. Inverting a full back there removes a wide outlet, isolates the winger, and vacates the exact space an opponent wants to attack. I have watched mid-table sides do this because it looked modern and get taken apart down both flanks.
There is also a personnel requirement people skip past. The inverted role demands a defender who can receive under pressure with his back to the touchline, turn, and pick a pass through a compact midfield. That is a midfielder's skill set. Most full backs were selected for pace, crossing and the willingness to run a hundred times, and asking them to become deep playmakers because of a tactical fashion is a good way to make a competent player look poor.
What I would keep from the idea, even at a smaller club, is the underlying principle rather than the shape. The principle is that your build-up should put players where the opponent's press is not, and that the answer changes depending on what the press looks like. Sometimes that is a full back stepping in. Sometimes it is a centre back stepping out, or a midfielder dropping between them, or simply going long.
Copying the shape without the reasoning is how tactics become costume. And there is quite a lot of costume about at the moment.
📊 Community Poll
Should helmets be mandatory in all amateur sports?

